La Coordinadora: A Union Without Bureaucrats

One Big Union cartoon

Stan Weir recommended the author, Don Fitz, visit La Coordinadora the Spanish longshore union because at the time -- in the 1980s -- they only had 2 full time union staffers, who made the same pay as other longshore workers, but their autonomous union had 8,000 members, representing 80% of Spanish dockers.

"La Coordinadora" is the Spanish longshoremen's union whose unique combination of hiring hall job rotation, industrial unionism, and Spanish anarcho-syndicalist assemblyism results in one of the most democratic labor organizations anywhere in the world. The forces of "containerization" and conflict with Socialist and Communist dominated labor federations have filled Coordinadora's brief history with one national port shut-down after another.

I heard of Coordinadora from Stan Weir, a former West Coast longshoreman who wrote about Coordinadora after a 1982 visit. When I started probing him for details, Weir urged me to talk directly with the longshoremen he had met. Taking up his suggestion, I happened to arrive In Barcelona two days before a strike that halted shipping throughout Spain. The government was attempting to rush through port reorganization without union input. If it was unresponsive to the December 28, 1987 strike, Coordinadora threatened a week long strike to be followed by a one-hour-work-the-next-hour-don't-work strike indefinitely.

The last Sunday in 1987, I met Juan Madrid who is a Coordinadora delegado or delegate, something like a shop steward in American Unions. After Madrid finished unloading Nissans, he spent the rest of the day showing me the government-run hiring hall, the Barcelona harbor, and the dockers union headquarters.

Though few Americans are aware of it, some of the most extensive job control that workers have ever attained was among US West Coast longshoremen and merchant seamen, who won full union control of hiring in the 1930s and kept it until 1960. Despite having to work through government-run halls, Spanish dockers have approached these gains in their control over hiring. Both in Barcelona and Valencia (which I visited a week later), dockers pointed with great pride to the rows and columns of tags which each bear one longshoreman's number. Those at the top of the list receive the first jobs that come in. Job dispatchers of the Office for Port Labor (OTP), a division of the Spanish Labor Ministry, then move the tags of those who are hired to the bottom of the list.

This system of job rotation lies at the core of strikes which have shaken Spanish harbors. Dockers repeatedly emphasize that there is no favoritism in their work assignments. With work evenly distributed, there is no group of unemployed longshoremen who might step in when others are on strike. Their hiring halls include every docker-rank and file longshoremen, delegados, local president, and national officers.

Well aware that most unions offer election to office as the best way to escape from the workplace, Spanish longshoremen take pride in the everyday practice of their egalitarian ideology. But there's another part of job rotation which is pure pragmatism. Enamored with Coordinadora's strength, the two larger union federations have both tried to woo it. Dockers have generally scorned them, largely because they know that being absorbed into an established labor federation would mean being assigned professional negotiators at contract time. They insist that the only people who can negotiate for dockers are those who work on the docks.

It's easy to understand this hard line when driving through the ports with men who operate loading/unloading equipment. At one time, long shoring provided jobs for 20,000 men. They worked in tight-knit groups, making sure that cargo was hauled in and stacked properly. But the days of lifting bundles, rolling barrels, and wheeling crates on dollies are two decades past. By the early 1970s, Spain experienced the world-wide effects of "containerization." Cargo is now packed into 40' x 8' x 8' containers (the smaller sizes are 20' long). Straddle carriers, giant forklifts and cranes load containers into ships and unload them directly onto trucks and trains.

Shippers laud this transformation as a technological wonder. It has allowed them to dramatically increase the quantity of cargo moved while cutting the number of the world's longshore jobs in half. Spain has lost 10,000 longshoremen by retiring workers not being replaced. With virtually no new jobs created, containerization has effectively destroyed the tradition of sons learning longshoring from their fathers.

The other reason that dockers are unlikely to share the shippers' ecstasy over this mechanization marvel is its effect on worklife. Crane operators now sit isolated, 20 to 50 above deck level. Partners fasten containers from each side, only able to see each other briefly when they get to the end of the container. This new type of work has reduced the number of accidents while increasing their severity. Several times a year, Coordinadora's paper, la Estiba, reports a docker whose leg was crushed or who was killed by a falling container.

A few blocks away from the waterfront building which houses the government-run hiring hall is Barcelona Coordinadora's union building. Maritime history runs through its walls. Owned by the anarchist union before the Spanish Civil War, it was seized by Franco in 1939. When the 1976 post-Franco government was turning over large quantities of confiscated property to Spain's mushrooming unions, dockers asked for it back. Not comfortable dealing with such a headstrong workforce, the government waffled. Barcelona dockers then physically occupied the building. This is somewhat reminiscent of US sit-down strikes of the 30s, lunch-counter civil rights sit-ins, and student anti-war occupations of administration buildings. The is that the longshoremen never left, only compromising to pay the government rent.

On Monday, December 28, the General Assembly of all Barcelona dockers gathered at the hiring hall to approve the National Coordinating Committee's recommendation. Then, I was invited to join about 25 longshoremen for the delegados' meeting in the union building which planned the strike details for Barcelona. They briefly put aside linking up with the national port strike to pump me for information about the American labor movement. "Why do workers in the U.S. vote for the capitalist parties?" "Why wasn't there a general strike when Reagan attacked PATCO?" "Do American workers support the union leaders?" "If they don't, why don't they vote them out?" "Why are only 17% of Americans in unions?"

This was one of the few times dockers invited theoretical questions during my two week visit.
My interest in how Coordinadora structured itself to guard against bureaucratization always seemed to get sidetracked into the longshoremen's favorite topic of conversation--their ability to bring a total halt to Spanish shipping.

The 1980s opened with a general port shut-down over the government system of comites de empresa (often translated "works committees"). They consist of delegados who are elected by a complex proportion which has worker/delegado ratio increase as the number of employees increases. The larger unions worked out a deal whereby the government would reimburse each elected delegate for 40 hours of work per month to him to free him to do union tasks. Spanish port strikes erupted when the government repeatedly ignored Coordinadora's request that delegados be reimbursed likewise. The 1980 struggle was costly. During mass picketing in Las Palmas (the large port in the Spanish Canary Islands off the coast of North Africa) a non-union truck driver ran over and killed a striker's seventeen year-old daughter. The government gave in; but, her picture still reminds everyone entering the Barcelona union office of the price Coordinadora paid for equal treatment.

In 1982, the social democratic PSOE (Socialist Workers Party of Spain) assumed power, leading many dockers to wonder if the attacks on their union would abate. They did not. PSOE's Felipe Gonzalez had to deal with the employer claim that strong hiring halls and repeated port turmoil made Spanish docks inefficient by the standards of the world market. Within a few years of becoming Prime Minister, Felipe demonstrated that a social democratic government could pursue "privatization" with a vigor that would make Margaret Thatcher blush green with envy.

The years immediately preceding PSOE's "reorganization" plan saw a series of strikes that were most typical of Spain's port conflicts. In 1983, the Sea-Land Company began to use non-registered dockers to unload fish in the southern port of Algeciras. The local media hyped that the strike was being manipulated by Barcelona dockers at expense of Algeciras jobs. In the middle of this campaign, the UGT (General Union of Workers, affiliate of PSOE) persuaded several dockers to march in a back-to-work parade carrying banners reading "Algeciras, Si; Barcelona, No!"

Several nation-wide port shut-downs convinced Algeciras longshoremen that were not being sacrificed to the Catalonians, and Sea-Land finally signed a 1985 agreement to use only hiring hall dockers. That this beef spread across three years shows that longshoremen did not achieve perfect unity. The possibility of some dockers grabbing at the lure of permanent employment with one shipper is an omnipresent threat to the port workers. The frequency of Spain's port strikes comes largely from the shippers' urge to test whether docker unity can be broken.

The conflict was to a new intensity in early 1986. Employers were able to push through a law that the OTP would be replaced with 27 regional consejos estatales (state councils). The divide-and-conquer strategy would force separate agreements in each port, thereby allowing shippers to increase their business where the union proved weakest. Even more important, the law could reduce the hiring halls to providing only one of four types of docker. A more privileged category would be steady employees of the major shipping companies. Companies would also be free to hire "occasional workers" during periods of intense port activity. A fourth category would be part-time workers in a sort of state-run training program (Employers are pushing similar programs in ports throughout world, including U.S. ports). The shippers dreamed of a laissez faire labor world where groups of longshoremen would compete among themselves within each port while ports would compete with each other. But, ambiguity in the statutes seemed to invite a whole new round of strikes to specify how they would be implemented.

No one had to wait long. The government initiated a massive publicity drive to win support for port "modernization." Angered that Spanish media would not present side, Barcelona dockers drove a caravan of loading equipment out of the harbor. As the police ordered them to turn around, they responded that, if they were not allowed to pass, they would drive the machinery into the water. The police down backed down; the dockers tied up Barcelona traffic for two hours; and Spanish media presented Coordinadora's interpretation of the law.

Despite this tremendous morale boost, the law was a profound victory for the employers. Later that year, shipping company Contenemar, decided that it was time to flex employer muscle in a big way. It initiated an unabashed drive to sign up Barcelona dockers without going through the hiring hall. Particularly strikes shut down Spanish ports. Fascist groups provided several dozen strikebreakers. Union demonstrators broke through police lines, dragged the scabs off of forklifts and threw them in the water. But, the fascists were back under heavier police guard the following day and it was only the ability to close down ports across the country that pressured Contenemar into signing a 1987 agreement to phase out non-registered dockers.

Simmering beneath this turmoil is a deep distrust between politically-influenced unions. The tendencies that mushroomed death Franco's 1975 death seemed to pick up where thing had left off in 1939. Though the Union General de Trababajores (UGT) has close ties with PSOE, it has increasingly shown a willingness to criticize the social democratic party. Similarly, "workers' commissions" (comisiones obreras, or, CC.OO.) has some degree of independence from the Spanish Communist Party (PCE). The much smaller anarchist union, Confederacion Nacional de Trabajo (CNT), has split into two factions, each claiming to be the true descendant of Civil War days.

When the first post-Franco government announced toleration of all parties except the PCE, longshoremen joined the 1976 strike to force it legalization. Shippers fired seven longshoremen as the government was giving in. The dockers then asked the PCE to organize a strike to help get their jobs back and were told that the time was not right. Dockers then formed their own union, La Coordinadora Estatal de los Portuarios, or, "la Coordinadora" as it has come to be
known.

Coordinadora immediately outdistanced the UGT and CC.OO., each of which sought to organize Spanish ports. It won over 99% support in the two largest ports of Las Palmas and Barcelona. Of the three medium-sized ports, Coordinadora has 80% support in Bilbao and over 90% support in Valencia and Cadiz. The UGT and CC.OO. each predominate in one of the 17 or 18 smaller ports, with Coordinadora averaging over 90% support in the others.

Coordinadora is currently Spain's only industrial union. While UGT and CC.OO. frequently win a majority in individual workplaces, they have never been able to match its 80% support throughout a major industrial sector. The longshore union has further consolidated itself by avoiding overt identification with either branch of anarchists. It urges all dockers to join, regardless of their political affiliation.

The American observer cannot help but notice a wage egalitarianism which is foreign to unions in this country, where contract talk addresses "fair differentials." That local delegados and national officers make the same as other longshoremen is a given. They work the docks just as any other union member and devote their time to union office, except for the zone and national meetings when the union compensates them for time lost at their regular pay rate. This 8,000-member union gets by with a total of two paid employees, who are not officers and have no power other than what answering letters brings. Coordinadora carefully sets their salary at the same level that dockers make.

The same ideology of egalitarianism runs through its meeting structure, which shows remnants of the anarchism practiced during the Spanish Civil War. In perhaps the only historic instance of peasants' instituting land collectivization rather than resisting it, rural Aragonese tossed out the local gentry and shared the farming of large estates. Unlike Russia of 20 years earlier, Catalonian workers did not look to the state to organize industry, but seized and ran it themselves. Rural anarcho-communists and urban anarcho-syndicalists both developed assemblyism --the idea that general assemblies make important decisions and elected delegados have no power other than carrying out those mandates.

Learning that any docker can attend delegado meetings is apt to arouse mixed emotions. On one hand, the openness is a welcome relief to the "business union" practices of closing the doors to all but the leadership. Yet, it may seem that there is little point in electing delegados if anyone who shows up can vote. Rather than reflecting "looseness," this structure of delegado meetings verifies that ultimate power rests with the General Assembly.

Accepting as a delegado means volunteering to do a great deal of work for the union--showing up at a delegado meeting is a way of volunteering to do the work of helping to hammer out the details of implementing decisions of the General Assembly. It is a sign of maturity for a delegado to be able to put personal feelings aside and vote in a way that best carries out the mood of the General Assembly. "Packing" a delegado meeting with those who would vote a certain way would be seen as infantile. It would also be an exercise in futility since the next General Assembly meeting would simply reverse any decision made.

Even though there is tremendous social pressure, occasionally a longshoreman will not give in. This happened early in Coordinadora's history, when it decided to have frequent zone and national meetings which would be funded from the money the government reimburses delegados for union work. Longshoremen voted that delegados would donate government money to the union, thereby requiring them to do their delegate work on top of a full month's longshore work. Two elected delegados refused to go along with their General Assemblies' majority vote and thereby revived another tradition of Spanish anarchism--immediate recall of anyone in an elected position.

On New Year's Eve day, I had the chance to discuss the intricacies of Coordinadora's finances with Julian Garcia, current National Coordinator. Though this position is more or less analogous to a union president, Garcia does not show any of the effusive handshaking characteristic of chronic office-holders. With a soft-spoken tone complementing his intenseness, Garcia explained why the union felt so strong about delegados' their government reimbursement.

Garcia drew a diagram of Spain's 23 ports, each of which employs from six to over 1000 longshoremen. Coordinadora divides itself into five regions or zones: Catalonia, Valencia, Cadiz, Bilbao and the Canary Islands. Each zone has meetings between two or more representatives from each port. Meetings can as infrequent as monthly, or can be several times a week during negotiations or strikes. The National Coordinating Committee consists of the National Coordinator and one representative chosen by each zonal meeting. It is responsible for overall communication and nation-wide negotiations with the shippers and government.

These meetings are expensive because of their frequency. The majority of Coordinadora's budget goes to paying for food, lodging and time lost at work for representatives to attend these meetings. The systematic attempts to broaden the number of dockers who attend these wider meetings provides an opportunity for many to become acquainted with the concerns of those in other ports.

This sharing of thoughts is vital to Coordinadora's survival because each local is totally autonomous. They have no concept of a national body putting a local into "receivership," or grabbing its bank account and appointing its officers as is done in the US. The national union cannot force locals to go out on strike. The only way a national port strike can occur is for each autonomous union to recognize that a threat to another port is a threat to itself. Democracy in the sense of gaining 50% + 1 votes cannot apply to port strikes. Every major port must be shut down for the strike to win. Zonal meetings are not so much for dockers to have a formal vote as a time to figure out if the feeling of militancy is simultaneously high in every port.

Aware the dangers of interport rivalry, Coordinadora's zonal meetings are a communication system which uses strong feelings between longshoremen as a basis for solidarity between ports. There is an interesting parallel in the way the union selects its National Coordinator. There is such a dislike of power politics that they use a two part process: first, a national vote decides the port he will come from; and, second, dockers from that port elect him. In this way, longshoremen prevent the "electioneering" that accompanies nation-wide elections--the officer is chosen only by people who have worked with him on the docks.

Like many other dockers, Julian Garcia had thought about Coordinadora's joining one of the small anarchist CNTs. The split which created town CNTs occurred over the government-sponsored comites de empresa (work committees). The more radical CNT, accused of "purism" by its opponents, argues that any involvement with the comites co-opts people into an elitist system that negotiates contracts behind the backs of union members. They charge that this is a betrayal of the anarchist principle that only General Assemblies of all workers can speak for the employees of any enterprise. The other CNT, accused of "reformism," has won election to several comites across Spain. It claims that having an anarchist or two on the comite allows them to tell the Assembly what the employers and union big shots are cooking up.

The practical difficulty for both CNTs is that Assemblies tend not to function except during strikes. To my knowledge, Coordinadora is the only union which turns out thousands of workers across the country to attend the Assemblies week after week. Assemblyist democracy thus has a meaning for the practice of longshore unionism while it only exists in theory (or during brief times) for the bona fide anarchist unions.

Sitting around in Spanish bars can provide a glimpse of an organization that may be too intimate for its participants to recognize. There seems to a subtle difference between the feelings of officers and other members about Coordinadora. Quite aware that they are part a movement that is undeniably unique, both eventually get around to asking, "What do you think about our union?" The average member who has never held office seemed to be waiting to hear "muy fuerte," confirming that his union is "very strong." For a rank and file docker docker who probably had a relative tortured or murdered by the Franco regime, the chance to describe the ecstasy of throwing a rightist scab into the water is enough to make his day. It's not necessary to
understand Catalonian or Valenciano dialects to see the gleam in an eye that unquestionably translates, "We got to kick fascist ass that day."

Delegados and national officers who have been repeatedly exposed to negotiations are quicker to look beyond local physical skirmishes. The latest conflict found the government backing down and agreeing to involve Coordinadora in planning any port changes. But, the powerful array of shippers, government, and Socialist and Communist union federations lined up on the other side make them worry openly about Coordinadora's future.

One of its greatest current dangers is isolation. None of the European dockers' unions associated with social democratic or Communist federations are interested in permanent alliances. In the U.S., scarcely a dozen articles about it have appeared in small left papers. Top leaders of the I.L.W.U. (International Longshoremen and Warehousemen's Union) and I.L.A. (International Longshoremen's Association) have not made contact with Coordinadora or informed their members of any of its struggles, even though American longshoremen are now threatened by the "steadyman" category (permanent, non-hiring hall dockers).

Perhaps the most amazing fact about Coordinadora is that it exists. Withstanding all of the forces aligned against it, including decimation by automation and twelve years of strike turmoil, the union shows no sign of losing the faith of 80% of Spain's longshoremen. Their shared ideology of egalitarianism plays no small role in the ranks' standing so tightly with the organizers. No one in Coordinadora denies that people who are frequently elected to office have more input than those who have never run. What is refreshing is an embarrassment about informal hierarchies which stands in such stark contrast to the typical "business union" officer who accepts union power elites as an unalterable fact of life.

American unions desperately need a turnaround in their continuing plunge in membership. If they are to capture the inspiration of vast numbers of service workers and proletarianized professionals, unions must be more than a grey blob of nonimagination. One must wonder if it is utterly impossible for a union movement to dynamically preach the values of racial equality, anti-militarism, sexual liberation, ecological sanity, and, most important, an absence of domineering relationships in working towards these goals. In the absence of any currently viable model of non-authoritarianism in the American labor movement, developments on Spanish docks could well be worth some close scrutiny.

Of course, the future could well see these longshoremen as Don Quixotes of the 1980's, chasing after antiquated notions of membership control, woefully unable to accommodate to the world of the Universal Bureaucrat. But strange things happen. It's also possible that one day people will look back at Coordinadora as a pioneer of born-again unionism that rediscovered day-to-day social equality.

Don Fitz

Originally published as "La Coordinadora: A Union Without Bureaucrats," in Within the Shell of the Old: Essays on Workers' Self-Organization, edited by Don Fitz and David Roediger (Chicago: Charles H. Kerr, 1990), pp. 88-96

AttachmentSize
La Coordinadora A Union Without Bureaucrats.pdf670.97 KB

Comments

akai
Sep 8 2011 12:48

Can't help but notice the similarities and differences between this article and this one, which the editors at Libcom used to think was "very uncritical". http://libcom.org/library/spanish-dock-workers-build-union-without-bureaucrats

Is still a very uncritical article... wonder why Libcom needs another uncritical source of information on this.

Juan Conatz
Sep 8 2011 13:41

Well, maybe one who thinks its uncritical should explain why?

Joseph Kay
Sep 8 2011 13:49

iirc the coordinardora wasn't a union but an assembly-delegate structure which members of many unions participated in. and it did bureaucratise and go reformist after the struggles died down. haven't got sources to hand so that's just from memory.

Fall Back
Sep 8 2011 14:02
akai wrote:
Can't help but notice the similarities and differences between this article and this one, which the editors at Libcom used to think was "very uncritical". http://libcom.org/library/spanish-dock-workers-build-union-without-bureaucrats

Is still a very uncritical article... wonder why Libcom needs another uncritical source of information on this.

It wasn't added by an admin.

Mark.
Sep 8 2011 16:11
Joseph Kay wrote:
iirc the coordinardora wasn't a union but an assembly-delegate structure which members of many unions participated in. and it did bureaucratise and go reformist after the struggles died down. haven't got sources to hand so that's just from memory.

Here's the Coordinadora's website. They're clearly now a union rather than a movement of assemblies but beyond that I've found very little comment on them, either critical or supportive. There's nothing really about them on alasbarricadas for example. I don't think it's enough just to say they're bureaucratic or reformist (although for all I know they may well be) without something to back it up.

Joseph Kay
Sep 8 2011 16:26

this AF member's critique of syndicalism (somewhat oddly) says they're not a union, but uses that to attack syndicalism because they bureaucratised. This must be what I was thinking of. I don't know what their sources were though:

an AFer wrote:
This process is graphically exhibited in the development of the Dockworkers Co-ordination in Spain, the Coordinadora, which emerged in the 1970s. Although this organisation was not specifically anarcho-syndicalist (or indeed syndicalist at all), it was based on an anti-buearcratic, anti-party political, class based and highly 'democratic' structure which involved members of the CNT. Born in the struggles in the ports and in the wider Spanish working class , the Coordinadora, organising through mass assemblies, appeared to be an example of a permanent 'union' organisation which would not succumb to bureaucratisation, routinism and class-collaboration. For years the Coordinadora was involved in struggles which maintained its combatitative momentum and won the admiration of libertarian revolutionaries. With the slow wind-down of those struggles the organisation, however, became less and less dynamic and more and more like a traditional Trade Union, despite the heroic efforts of the anti-capitalist militants involved in it. The coordinadora is a perfect example of how bureaucracy is a natural by-product of economic organisations in periods of 'defeat'.
Mark.
Sep 8 2011 17:20
Joseph Kay wrote:
this AF member's critique of syndicalism (somewhat oddly) says they're not a union, but uses that to attack syndicalism because they bureaucratised. This must be what I was thinking of. I don't know what their sources were though:

This pamphlet may be one of the sources. It's a long time since I read it but as I remember it takes an assemblyist anti-union line. What I'd really like to see is something written about the Coordinadora in the last twenty years with some first-hand knowledge - in English or Spanish.

nastyned
Sep 8 2011 21:29

The Organise! article doesn't look odd to me.

The was a long article about the coordinardora in 'Exchanges', translated from the Spanish journal 'Etcetera'. I was looking for it online a while ago but I couldn't find it.

Mark.
Sep 8 2011 21:59

Any idea if the original article in Spanish is online anywhere?

Edit: Found it - http://www.sindominio.net/etcetera/REVISTAS/ETC-10.pdf - from Etcétera site here

Quote:
Durante los años 70-76, un movimiento de asambleas se abre paso en España, a caballo de una lucha entre antifranquista y anticapitalista. Vitoria, Fasa-Renault, Roca... La legalización de las centrales sindicales, el «golpe» y el cerrar filas en torno a la democracia, la entrada de los socialistas en el gobierno, y, en definitiva, la crisis y el paro, la represión abierta... acaban con tal movimiento, que si no fue muy lejos, sí planteó con suficiente fuerza algunas verdades: el poder de las asambleas, la acción directa, las asambleas, o los sindicatos... En aquel proceso se fragua la práctica de asambleas en los puertos que hoy perdura. Pero ahora es ya un movimiento fuera de contexto. Más aún, cuando las asambleas de portuarios se concretan como organización en Coordinadora, es cuando el movimiento asambleario a nivel de toda la clase obrera en España, muere. Esto va a explicar las ambigüedades antes señaladas y los límites de su acción. Aquel movimiento de asambleas se desarrolló durante una fase de auge. El Capital podía satisfacer las reivindicaciones que le planteaban colectivos de trabajadores. En contra de las burocracias sindicales un movimiento reivindicativo de base pudo constituirse, afirmándose como tal. Hoy, el capital en crisis de valorización, no tiene nada que ofrecer. Aquel movimiento reivindicativo de base no tiene lugar. La lucha que enfrenta a los estibadores con el estado no tiene otra salida que el enfrentamiento. Cuando los estibadores dejen de luchar, dejaran de ser estibadores.

Etcétera, octubre 1986

Again this suggests an assemblyist position that assumes that the transformation from assemblies to a union automatically spells doom. I'd still like to see some evidence for this in the case of the Coordinadora.

Joseph Kay
Sep 8 2011 22:09
nastyned wrote:
The Organise! article doesn't look odd to me.

Fwiw I largely agree with the argument. What I find odd is saying 'this is not anarcho-syndicalism, but it proves why anarcho-syndicalism is wrong', when there actually was an anarcho-syndicalist union involved (the most famous one to boot), and it didn't degenerate in the way the article claims is inevitable.

I'd ech Mark that I'd like to see English/Spanish sources on the coordinadora since. I'm perfectly willing to accept it's degenerated (but evidence is needed, of course), but even if that's the case the mechanisms by which that happened and the timescale involved are worthy of study. Was it overnight or a slow degeneration? Was it pressures towards moderation from below, or the de facto leadership becoming a bureaucracy? etc.

nastyned
Sep 8 2011 22:12

I can't remember the details but the article in Exchanges had a resignation letter from several militants leaving as the Coordinadora became less militant and more bureaucratic.

Mark.
Sep 8 2011 22:53
nastyned wrote:
I can't remember the details but the article in Exchanges had a resignation letter from several militants leaving as the Coordinadora became less militant and more bureaucratic.

The letter isn't in the Etcetera article so maybe Exchanges got it from a different source. It would be interesting to see it if anyone can find it.

Irish Rambler
Sep 9 2011 13:35

The Barcelona dockers' open assembly remains an example to us all especially given the fact that it was a defensive struggle, "a question of survival", as they themselves put it. Most importantly-though, the workers won. However these texts are uneven in quality some are inspiringly clear, others a little muddled. Also there's some repetition. But before raising an accusatory finger bear in mind these texts are an example of workers writing accurately about their own struggle and attempting to communicate their knowledge and experience to others.

See Workers of the world tonight: International dockers struggles of the 1980s below.

nastyned
Sep 9 2011 16:33
Mark. wrote:

The letter isn't in the Etcetera article so maybe Exchanges got it from a different source. It would be interesting to see it if anyone can find it.

Maybe it's from a later issue? The one you linked to was '86 and the article in Exchanges was at some point in the 90s.

nastyned
Sep 9 2011 16:34
Joseph Kay wrote:
nastyned wrote:
The Organise! article doesn't look odd to me.

What I find odd is saying 'this is not anarcho-syndicalism, but it proves why anarcho-syndicalism is wrong'

Oddly enough it doesn't say that.

Samotnaf
Oct 3 2011 07:28

99% sure that in the 1990s, long after its radical heyday, the coordinadora actually voted for redundancies.

syndicalist
Jun 17 2013 14:31

I believe this article first appeared in the WSA's ideas and action
magazine: http://www.uncanny.net/~wsa/coordinadora.htm

Mark.
Mar 17 2017 01:01
Mark. wrote:
What I'd really like to see is something written about the Coordinadora in the last twenty years with some first-hand knowledge - in English or Spanish.

I think this radio interview (link also posted on the Spanish dock workers union thread) is the best thing I've found on this, though it's in Spanish and listening to and understanding an interview is likely to be more of a challenge than reading an article.

http://anabasis.radioqk.org/110-lucha-autonoma-en-el-puerto-de-barcelona-1976-1986/

Quote:
Hablamos con Francisco Aroca de las luchas en las que participó como estibador del Puerto de Barcelona, que han tendido a verse como el epílogo de la autonomía obrera en la Transacción española: el trabajo en los puertos ayer y hoy, la repercusión de la jornada de lucha de la C.O.S. en noviembre de 1976 y la cristalización de la Organización de Estibadores Portuarios de Barcelona como instrumento de lucha asambleario, autónomo y anticapitalista, su extensión al resto del Estado como Coordinadora y sus ramificaciones internacionales, su relación con otras luchas del momento, su degeneración; la lucha contra la “reconversión” del trabajo portuario en 1980-81 y 1986 con los gobiernos de UCD y del PSOE, la huelga selectiva y la socialización del salario, la represión patronal, policial y mediática, el órgano de expresión La Estiba, etc.

Francisco Aroca worked as a docker in the port of Barcelona for 33 years, starting in 1973. He makes some criticisms of the direction taken by the Coordinadora in later years, while I think still supporting it. Anyway I'd say it would be best for people to listen to the interview and make their own judgements.